Consistent improvement in health-related quality of life with tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Novel and conventional responder analyses - 04/11/16
, Eric D. Bateman b
, Paul Jones c
, Valentina B. Zubek d
, Norbert Metzdorf e
, Dacheng Liu d
, Thomas Leonard d
, Emmanuelle Clerisme-Beaty d
, Robert A. Wise f 
Abstract |
Introduction |
Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in COPD patients is an important pharmacotherapeutic objective. This study investigated the extent, consistency, and durability of tiotropium maintenance therapy impact on HRQoL in moderate-to-very severe COPD.
Methods |
Patients received once-daily tiotropium 18 μg (n = 5244) or placebo (n = 4799) via HandiHaler® (10 trials), or once-daily tiotropium 5 μg (n = 2622) or placebo (n = 2618) via Respimat® inhaler (3 trials). St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores were measured at baseline, and 6 months (13 trials) and 1 year (9 trials) from treatment start. Adjusted mean differences between treatments for change from baseline in total scores were calculated at each time-point for each trial. Responder and deteriorator rates (decrease or increase in score ≥4 units from baseline, respectively), net benefit (responder rate increase plus deteriorator rate decrease), and cumulative improvement and deterioration were determined.
Results |
Adjusted mean total score differences between treatments for change from baseline were significant (p < 0.05) in favor of tiotropium in 10/13 trials at 6 months and in 8/9 trials at 1 year. In all trials, estimated differences in responder rates between treatments favored tiotropium (significant [p < 0.05]: 5/13 trials at 6 months; 8/9 trials at 1 year). Net benefit favored tiotropium and cumulative improvement rates were consistently greater and deterioration rates consistently lower for tiotropium versus placebo.
Conclusions |
Tiotropium maintenance therapy significantly and consistently improved HRQoL in moderate-to-very severe COPD patients in a durable manner. These results may provide a benchmark for assessing benefits on HRQoL of other COPD treatments.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Novel SGRQ response analyses assessed HRQoL in COPD (tiotropium vs placebo). |
• | SGRQ total scores were consistently better for patients on tiotropium vs placebo. |
• | SGRQ score net benefit was better for tiotropium vs placebo at 6 months and 1 year. |
• | Tiotropium maintenance therapy vs placebo had long-term sustained benefit on HRQoL. |
• | These data may be a benchmark to assess benefits on HRQoL of other COPD therapies. |
Keywords : Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Clinical trials, Health-related quality of life, Responder and deteriorator rates, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Tiotropium
Abbreviations : COPD, EXACTT, FEV1, FVC, HRQoL, ICS, LABA, LAMA, MCID, MMRM, SAFE, SGRQ, TIPHON, UPLIFT
Plan
Vol 120
P. 91-100 - novembre 2016 Retour au numéroDéjà abonné à cette revue ?


