S'abonner

Genotype-guided tamoxifen therapy: time to pause for reflection? - 11/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70030-0 
Timothy L Lash, DrDSc a, b, c, , Ernst A Lien, PhD d, e, Henrik Toft Sørensen, DMSc a, b, Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit, FRCPath f
a Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA 
b Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark 
c Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA 
d Hormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 
e Institute of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 
f Institute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark 

* Correspondence to: Dr Timothy L Lash, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Summary

Tamoxifen remains a cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage breast cancer and oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours. Accurate markers of tamoxifen resistance would allow prediction of tamoxifen response and personalisation of combined therapies. Recently, it has been suggested that patients with inherited non-functional alleles of the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 might be poor candidates for adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, because women with these variant alleles have reduced concentrations of the tamoxifen metabolites that most strongly bind the oestrogen receptor. In some studies, women with these alleles have a higher risk of recurrence than women with two functional alleles. However, dose-setting studies with clinical and biomarker outcomes, studies associating clinical outcomes with serum concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites, and a simple model of receptor binding, all suggest that tamoxifen and its metabolites should reach concentrations sufficient to achieve the therapeutic effect regardless of CYP2D6 inhibition. Ten epidemiology studies on the association between CYP2D6 genotype and breast cancer recurrence report widely heterogeneous results with relative-risk estimates outside the range of reasonable bounds. None of the explanations proposed for the heterogeneity of these results adequately account for the variability and no design feature sets apart any study or subset of studies as most likely to be accurate. The studies reporting a positive association might receive the most attention, because they report a result consistent with the profile of metabolite concentrations; not because they are more reliable by design. We argue that a recommendation for CYP2D6 genotyping of candidates for tamoxifen therapy, and its implicit conclusion regarding the association between genotype and recurrence risk, is premature.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2009  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 10 - N° 8

P. 825-833 - août 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Monoclonal antibody-associated progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy in patients treated with rituximab, natalizumab, and efalizumab: a Review from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project
  • Kenneth R Carson, Daniele Focosi, Eugene O Major, Mario Petrini, Elizabeth A Richey, Dennis P West, Charles L Bennett
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Mutations and cancer: one or two historical perspectives?
  • Michael A Dyer, David H Abramson

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?