S'abonner

Hantavirus Infections in Europe - 28/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00774-6 
Olli Vapalahti, Professor a, g, , Jukka Mustonen b, Åke Lundkvist c, Heikki Henttonen d, Alexander Plyusnin e, g, Antti Vaheri f, g
a Division of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki and HUCH Laboratory Diagnostics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland 
b Department of the Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland 
c Department of Virology, Karolinska Institute and Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden 
d Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa, Finland 
e Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm 
f HUCH Laboratory Diagnostics, Helsinki University Central Hospital 
g Department of Virology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 

* Correspondence: Professor Olli Vapalahti, Haartman Institute, Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, POB 21, FIN-00014, Finland. Tel +358 40 838 4015; fax+358 9 1912 6491

Summary

Hantaviruses are enveloped RNA viruses each carried by a specific rodent species. Three hantaviruses, Puumala, Dobrava, and Saaremaa viruses, are known to cause haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. In Europe, Puumala causes a generally mild disease, nephropathia epidemica, which presents most commonly with fever, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, impaired renal function, and blurred vision, whereas Dobrava infections often also have haemorrhagic complications. There are few available data about the clinical picture of confirmed Saaremaa infections, but epidemiological evidence suggests that it is less pathogenic than Dobrava, and that Saaremaa infections are more similar to nephropathia epidemica caused by Puumala. Along with its rodent host, the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), Puumala is reported throughout most of Europe (excluding the Mediterranean region), whereas Dobrava, carried by the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis), and Saaremaa, carried by the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius), are reported mainly in eastern and central Europe. The diagnosis of acute hantavirus infection is based on the detection of virusspecific IgM. Whereas Puumala is distinct, Dobrava and Saaremaa are genetically and antigenically very closely related and were previously thought to be variants of the same virus. Typing of a specific hantavirus infection requires neutralisation antibody assays or reverse transcriptase PCR and sequencing.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2003  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 3 - N° 10

P. 653-661 - octobre 2003 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Tryptophan depletion and HIV Tryptophan depletion and HIV infection: a metabolic link to pathogenesis
  • Michael F Murray
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Following in Soper’s footsteps: northeast Brazil 63 years after eradication of Anopheles gambiae
  • Gerry F Killeen

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?