Suscribirse

Predictors of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in absence of radiologic honeycombing: A cross sectional analysis in ILD patients undergoing lung tissue sampling - 29/08/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.07.016 
Margaret L. Salisbury a, , Meng Xia b , Susan Murray b , Brian J. Bartholmai c , Ella A. Kazerooni d , Catherine A. Meldrum a , Fernando J. Martinez e , Kevin R. Flaherty a
a Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive 3916, Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States 
b Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, M4515 SPH II 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States 
c Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States 
d Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive SPC 5868, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States 
e Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Box 130, New York, NY, 10065, United States 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be diagnosed confidently and non-invasively when clinical and computed tomography (CT) criteria are met. Many do not meet these criteria due to absence of CT honeycombing. We investigated predictors of IPF and combinations allowing accurate diagnosis in individuals without honeycombing.

Methods

We utilized prospectively collected clinical and CT data from patients enrolled in the Lung Tissue Research Consortium. Included patients had no honeycombing, no connective tissue disease, underwent diagnostic lung biopsy, and had CT pattern consistent with fibrosing ILD (n = 200). Logistic regression identified clinical and CT variables predictive of IPF. The probability of IPF was assessed at various cut-points of important clinical and CT variables.

Results

A multivariable model adjusted for age and gender found increasingly extensive reticular densities (OR 2.93, CI 95% 1.55–5.56, p = 0.001) predicted IPF, while increasing ground glass densities predicted a diagnosis other than IPF (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.34–0.89, p = 0.02). The model-based probability of IPF was 80% or greater in patients with age at least 60 years and extent of reticular density one-third or more of total lung volume; for patients meeting or exceeding these clinical thresholds the specificity for IPF is 96% (CI 95% 91–100%) with 21 of 134 (16%) biopsies avoided.

Conclusions

In patients with suspected fibrotic ILD and absence of CT honeycombing, extent of reticular and ground glass densities predict a diagnosis of IPF. The probability of IPF exceeds 80% in subjects over age 60 years with one-third of total lung having reticular densities.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Predictors of IPF are evaluated in patients without radiologic honeycombing.
All had fibrotic interstitial lung disease and underwent diagnostic lung biopsy.
More extensive reticular densities are associated with a diagnosis of IPF.
IPF probability exceeds 80% when over 1/3 of lung contains reticular densities.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Interstitial lung disease, Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, High resolution computed tomography, Diagnosis

Abbreviations : HRCT, HP, IPF, ILD, LTRC, NSIP, UIP


Esquema


© 2016  Elsevier Ltd. Reservados todos los derechos.
Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 118

P. 88-95 - septembre 2016 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Clinical features and outcomes of interstitial lung disease in anti-Jo-1 positive antisynthetase syndrome
  • Ana C. Zamora, Sumedh S. Hoskote, Beatriz Abascal-Bolado, Darin White, Christian W. Cox, Jay H. Ryu, Teng Moua
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Patent foramen ovale in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: Long-term risk and morbidity
  • Alice Gallo de Moraes, Abhay Vakil, Teng Moua

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?