Suscribirse

Efficacy and safety comparison: Fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate, after step down from fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in Japanese patients with well-controlled asthma, a randomized trial - 04/11/16

Doi : 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.09.018 
Mitsuru Adachi a, Caroline Goldfrad b, Loretta Jacques c, Yoshie Nishimura d,
a Department of Clinical Research Centers, International University of Health and Welfare/Sanno Hospital, 10–16, Akasaka 8-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan 
b Quantitative Sciences Division, GSK, London, TW8 9GS, UK 
c Respiratory Medicine Discovery and Development, GSK, London, TW8 9GS, UK 
d Development & Medical Affairs Medicines Development Respiratory TA Office, GSK, 6-15, Sendagaya 4-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8566, Japan 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Background

For patients with well-controlled asthma, ‘step down’ of therapy is recommended. We evaluated Japanese patients switching from inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA; equivalent to fluticasone propionate [FP]/salmeterol [SAL] 250/50 μg twice daily [BD]) to fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol (VI) 100/25 μg, then stepping down to ICS alone.

Methods

This phase III trial had two treatment periods (P): P1, patients with well-controlled asthma on FP/SAL 250/50 μg BD equivalent stepped across to once daily (OD) FF/VI 100/25 μg (open-label, eight weeks); P2, patients remaining ‘well controlled’ after P1 stepped down to FF 100 μg OD/FP 100 μg BD/FP 250 μg BD (randomized 1:1:1, double-blind, 12 weeks). Co-primary P2 endpoints: percentage of patients with well-controlled asthma; time to withdrawal due to poorly controlled asthma requiring step-up therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored.

Results

At the end of P1 (n = 430), 373/415 (89.9%; 95% confidence interval 86.57–92.61) patients' asthma remained well controlled with FF/VI; in P2 (n = 371), control was maintained in 89.5% (FF 100 μg)/78.2% (FP 100 μg)/83.1% (FP 250 μg) of patients. In P2, 4.9–8.1% of patients were withdrawn due to worsening asthma (time-to-withdrawal cumulative incidence curves were comparable). AEs were reported by 37% of patients during P1; and by 36% (FF 100 μg)/48% (FP 100 μg)/49% (FP 250 μg) of patients in P2.

Conclusions

For patients with well-controlled asthma on mid dose ICS/LABA (equivalent to FP/SAL 250/50 μg BD), control can be maintained when they are stepped across to FF/VI 100/25 μg OD. FF 100 μg OD is an effective step-down therapy from FF/VI 100/25 μg OD with similar efficacy to FP 100 μg BD and FP 250 μg BD.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Study conducted in Japanese pts with well-controlled asthma on mid dose ICS/LABA.
90.5% of pts maintain control on switch from mid dose ICS/LABA to FF/VI 100/25OD.
Similar efficacy of FF100OD, FP100BD and FP250BD on step down from FF/VI 100/25OD.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Asthma, Well-controlled asthma, Inhaled corticosteroid, Long-acting beta2-agonist, ‘Step down’ of asthma therapy, ‘Step across’ of asthma therapy


Esquema


© 2016  The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 120

P. 78-86 - novembre 2016 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Subjects with well-controlled asthma have similar health-related quality of life as subjects without asthma
  • Sven-Arne Jansson, Malin Axelsson, Linnea Hedman, Mai Leander, Caroline Stridsman, Eva Rönmark
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Drug-related problems and pharmacist interventions in a cohort of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Sule Apikoglu-Rabus, Gozde Yesilyaprak, Fikret Vehbi Izzettin

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?