Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler® - 26/07/17
, A. Plich bAbstract |
Background |
Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poor inhalation technique, which can lead to poor disease control and high disease management costs. A recent study showed that patients make fewer inhaler errors when using the novel DuoResp® (BF) Spiromax® inhaler, compared with BF Turbuhaler®. Therefore switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® could improve inhalation technique, and potentially lead to better disease control and healthcare cost savings.
Methods |
A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® over three years in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK. The model estimated changes to the number, and associated cost, of unscheduled healthcare events. The model considered two scenarios: in Scenario 1, all patients were immediately switched from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax®; in Scenario 2, 4%, 8% and 12% of patients were switched in years 1, 2 and 3 of the model, respectively.
Results |
In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06.
Conclusions |
We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® are likely to improve patients' disease control and generate considerable cost savings through healthcare events avoided.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | An economic analysis of poor inhalation technique with asthma and COPD inhalers. |
• | Switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® may reduce inhaler errors. |
• | Cost savings from fewer inhaler errors may reach €15–100 million over 3 years. |
Keywords : Inhalation technique, Spiromax, Budget impact, Asthma, COPD
Esquema
Vol 129
P. 179-188 - août 2017 Regresar al número¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?


