Suscribirse

The development of sarcoidosis in patients receiving daclizumab: A case series from multiple clinical trials - 16/03/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.015 
Marc A. Judson a, , Brett M. Elicker b, Thomas V. Colby c, Sooyeon Kwon d, Elizabeth de Windt e, Spyros Chalkias e, Claudia Prada e, Karen Smirnakis e, Priya Singhal e
a Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, 12211, NY, USA 
b Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA 
c Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Emeritus), Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, 85259, AZ, USA 
d Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY, USA 
e Biogen, USA 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Introduction

Several drugs have been associated with druginduced sarcoidosis-like reactions (DISRs) that are clinically indistinguishable from sarcoidosis. Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to CD25 that has been studied for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). During MS clinical trials of daclizumab, 12 subjects developed clinical conditions potentially consistent with sarcoidosis. Therefore, an independent adjudication committee of individuals with expertise in sarcoidosis was organized to determine the likelihood of these cases representing sarcoidosis.

Methods

The adjudication committee consisted of a pulmonologist, pathologist, and radiologist with clinical experience in sarcoidosis. The committee had access to the subjects' laboratory data, narratives of all suspect adverse reaction reports, radiographic imaging and histology from biopsies. A priori, a grading system was developed to determine criteria to establish the likelihood that the patient had developed sarcoidosis.

Results

The adjudication confirmed sarcoidosis in 11/12 subjects. The committee's decisions were unanimous in all cases. Biopsies were available in 7/11 of these. In the 4 subjects who did not have a biopsy, they all had presentations, clinical findings, and/or laboratory findings that were highly specific for sarcoidosis. Alternative causes for these clinical findings were reasonably excluded in all cases. The lung (8/11) and skin (6/11) were the most common organs involved. The mean daclizumab dose given when signs or symptoms of sarcoidosis occurred was 5413 ± 2704 mg and the median time from first daclizumab dose was 996 days. The incidence rate of developing sarcoidosis in those participating in these daclizumab trials was 154/100,000 patient-years compared with incidence rates of sarcoidosis in the United States of 3.2–17.8/100,000/year. These data suggest that these sarcoidosis cases may have represented DISRs related to daclizumab therapy.

Conclusions

Given the clinical presentation and subsequent evaluation of these 11 subjects, we suspect that they had DISRs from daclizumab.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Sarcoidosis, Daclizumab, Diagnosis, Drug reaction


Esquema


© 2019  Elsevier Ltd. Reservados todos los derechos.
Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 149

P. 23-27 - mars 2019 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Can the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire predict the long-term outcomes in Japanese sarcoidosis patients?
  • Kiminobu Tanizawa, Tomohiro Handa, Sonoko Nagai, Toru Oga, Takeshi Kubo, Yutaka Ito, Kensaku Aihara, Kohei Ikezoe, Akihiko Sokai, Yoshinari Nakatsuka, Toyohiro Hirai, Kazuo Chin, Michiaki Mishima, Takateru Izumi
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Sarcoidosis: No longer a benign disease?
  • Alicia K. Gerke

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?